(Mike's Note: I wrote this a couple of days ago, and at the time I had no intention of posting it. Well, I've changed my mind. It was a unedited, free-form, stream-of-consciousness thing, so please take it in that spirit. And as always I'd appreciate your reactions.)
Count your blessings
Name them one by one
Count your blessings
See what God has done
Count your blessings
Name them one by one
And it will surprise you
What the Lord has done
Like me, you may have sung this chorus in Sunday School. Well, I've been thinking about it again lately. It's sugary, and it's theology-lite, but I think in some ways it's worse than that. Much worse. It promotes the blasphemy of the western gospel that positions God as a holy Santa Claus, giving gifts to all God's children--those on the list, anyway--and perhaps leaving a lump of coal, or worse, in the stockings of everyone else.
If you look at the words of the chorus again you'll see that this is not really what it says. But it's what we often think it says.
Yes, I do believe that God does bless us, but not necessarily in the ways we think. And I call this the western gospel because the developed world is the only place where this "works".
These are broad statements I'm making, but if you ask a group of western Christians how God has blessed them, I have no doubt that in the various answers you will find all of the following:
- Good health
- Good family
- Good job
- Material needs
I have many Jesus-following friends in other parts of the world--I'm thinking of Africa at the moment--who could not answer the same question the same way.
Good health? I have friends who live with HIV and AIDS. Yes, they are learning to "live positively", and yes, anti retro-viral drugs are more readily available to many of them so AIDS is no longer a death sentence. But they are not in good health and they never will be.
Good family? I have friends who have lost children, siblings, parents, or all of the above. I've met elderly women raising six, eight, ten children themselves. I've met children raising other children, the responsibilities of parenting thrust upon them by circumstances at an age when they should be playing and going to school themselves.
Good job? I have friends who cannot find work, who would travel for hours or even days just for the hope of work. I know people who have been ripped off by unscrupulous employers and have had to return home to hungry families with nothing to show for their absence.
Material needs? Now, I don't really need to go there, do I?
The thing is, these friends of mine also consider themselves to be blessed, but their lists would very likely not line up with ours at all.
I know what some of you are thinking: God blesses different people in different ways. While I agree with that statement, I do not believe that God chooses to bless people, a country, a part of the world, with material needs, and ignores the plight of so many in the rest of the world.
And yes, I know that your cousin knows a guy whose sister is married to a very wealthy man who is doing great things for God. We all know people like that, and thank God for them. God uses people with wealth just as God uses the poor, but that does not mean that wealth is a "blessing". It does not mean wealth is something we should strive for.
Look at my biblical friend, the Rich Young Guy, a wealthy man. A man who knew what the religious rules were, and followed them, well... religiously. Using our western yardsticks we probably would have considered him "blessed". He probably did to, right up until Jesus told him to sell it all and give the dough to the poor.
Jesus never said, "Blessed are the rich." He did, however, say, "Blessed are the poor."
Jesus never said be proud of the number of wealthy people on your church membership roll. However James--reportedly the brother of Jesus--said that we should show no favoritism, and furthermore that God has chosen those who the world deems as poor to actually inherit the Kingdom.
Then again, Jesus did say, "Whatever you do for the greatest of these, you do to me."
Wait a minute... I think I've got that last one wrong.
Recent Comments