I began the day in Delta, British Columbia, and now I find myself in
Oakville, Ontario. And in an odd kind of way I feel like I've spent the
day with Richard Rohr.
My day with Richard started off this morning with news of the upcoming
live Feast of Francis webcast Turning the World on it's Head: Subverting the Honor/Shame system.
The next email I opened was Richard's daily meditation, which said this:
I am convinced that most of the saints were religious
dropouts from societies that were going nowhere. Faith called them to
drop out and believe in something else.
Jesus' announcement of the reign of God was telling us that culture
as we've created it is on a track toward self-destruction and emptiness.
All we have to give up is the utterly false understanding that we
have of ourselves from civil society. For some reason that liberation
seems to be the most difficult thing in the world!
(From Radical Grace: Daily Meditations)
Then it was time to choose a couple of books to keep me company on the 4-hour flight. I'm slowly working my way through Jesus' Plan for New World: The Sermon on the Mount, so that one was a no-brainer. This is a small book, but incredibly rich, so I'm taking my time with it. I also grabbed The Enneagram: A Christian Perspective, by Rohr and Andreas Ebert. I've had this one for a while, and today seemed like a good time to start it.
Right out of the gate Rohr hit me with much of what is driving my
own thinking and writing these days. This is from his preface to The Enneagram:
"The vast majority of Christian ministry has been concerned
with 'churching' people into symbolic, restful, and usually ethnic
belonging systems rather than any real spiritual transformation into
the mystery of God."
And then,
"...I am convinced that most of our ministries have
legitimated the autonomous self and even fortified it with all kinds of
religious armour. Religious people are even harder to transform because
they don't think they need it."
Finally,
Much of what is called Christianity has more to do with
disguising the ego behind the screen of religion and culture than any
real movement toward a God beyond the small self, and a new self in
God."
I would label this "screen of religion and culture" as
ideology. Like Rohr, I also believe most of the Christian church is
steeped in this ideology. I would also lump the misguided concept of the
(North) American dream in with this. I believe the focus on the
spiritual inclinations of the American presidential candidates (and,
paradoxically, the lack of such a focus on the Canadian
political candidates) lends credence to this view. However the
political nature of this ideology is only part of this phenomenon, and
I don't want to get bogged down in that right now.
Unlike my traveling companion today, I use the word 'religion' in
the negative sense. This concern with "'churching' people into
symbolic, restful, and usually ethnic belonging systems" is what I call
religion. (Ironically, I'm in Oakville to attend a conference being
hosted by the church where I picked up view of the word, predominantly through the writing and teaching of a friend. But, I digress.)
So today I crossed a large part of this country with Richard by my
side. And I arrived tonight with a clearer understanding of what is
holding us back as the people of God. This is critical, as an accurate diagnosis is the
first step to an effective treatment.
Thanks for the company and insight today, Richard.
Recent Comments